網頁

2006年5月28日 星期日

pf + smp + nogaint network stack = ?

剛剛看到大神這篇「升級到 6.1-RELEASE」裡面喊說因為腳踏車鎖(Giant lock)太多,所以就把 root server 衝到 6.1 了,真的是勇敢的長輩 XD。不過我是看到 GIANT LOCK 才想到我忘了說我遇到的狀況,所以才趕快來紀錄一下。

話說我家美人機到了之後總是會亂 panic 及亂七八糟的事情,在這一篇有稍微提到我後來換 ipnat 之後改善很多,不過偶爾還是會從網路上消失。後來大概在五月中的時候, 看到 mailing list 有人疑似有類似的情形,環境也是 smp ,後來過了不久某篇裡面談到:

This is very similar to the UID/GID filtering problem. What appears to
be happening is on the inbound path, we pickup the pfil lock and attempt
to pickup the inp info lock, while on the outbound path, we hold the inp
info lock across ip_output which will try to pickup the pfil lock.

This problem is the result of a layering violation, in reality the
firewall should not be picking up layer 4 related locks. Myself and a
few others have been discussing this problem for quite some time now,
and hopefully it won't be long before we can come up with a solution
that will make everyone happy.

For now, you should be able to set debug.mpsafenet to 0 which will
re-enable Giant in the network stack, in theory preventing the deadlock.

debug.mpsafenet=0

in your loader.conf

Let me know if this helps


 於是乎,測試了一下,把腳踏車鎖關掉,開機會看到:「WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance.」
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
        The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #3: Wed May 17 22:41:10 CST 2006
    cookys@ddbeauty.iecs.us:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DDBEAUTY
WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance.
ACPI APIC Table: <GBT    AWRDACPI>
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D  CPU 2.66GHz (3340.93-MHz K8-class CPU)
  Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0xf47  Stepping = 7

 然後「感覺上」pf 好像反應比 ipnat 好,不過可能是錯覺 XD。雖然說腳踏車鎖一次就會綁一大堆,不過在會亂 dead lock 的狀況下也只能先打開撐著,看什麼時候他們解決 XD。至少跑到現在,兩個禮拜多都沒消失了,除了前一個禮拜被學校裝笑為把她 halt 等停電以外 :p

這時候該高呼,"捷安特鎖"我愛你嗎?(我沒有打廣告喔 @_@) 

1 則留言:

  1. [...] restore 完的最後一篇是同一天,差兩年罷了。所以這裡可以看出最近寫 blog 都寫的很不認真? [...]

    回覆刪除